Why More Data Doesn't Equal Better Decisions
- Scott Schang
- Jun 10
- 3 min read

In our continuing study of the way companies make use of their data, a strange contradiction has emerged.
Companies have invested billions in business intelligence platforms, data warehouses, and analytics dashboards. Yet many executives still find themselves making critical decisions based on gut instinct rather than data-driven insights.
This is what our Chief Data Scientist Scott Schang calls the Analytics Paradox. It means executives are drowning in information while starving for intelligence. He recently wrote about this in Scotsman Guide.
The Dashboard Deluge
Walk into any executive meeting today and you'll likely see multiple screens displaying colorful charts, real-time metrics, and sophisticated visualizations. Modern businesses have more access to data than at any point in history.
Sales figures, customer behavior patterns, operational metrics, market trends—all available at the click of a button.
Yet when the time comes to make critical strategic decisions, many leaders still find themselves thinking: "This is interesting, but what do I actually do with it?"
The truth is, having access to data isn't the same as having access to insights. And insights without actionability aren't really insights at all.
One of the most significant issues with traditional business intelligence is something few executives want to acknowledge: your competitors are looking at the same data you are.
Most BI tools operate within industry feedback loops—aggregating market trends, customer sentiment, and operational metrics that everyone in your space is already tracking.
When everyone has access to the same reports, trends, and industry benchmarks, how can any single company gain an edge?
The uncomfortable answer is that they can't. Organizations end up making the same strategic moves as their competitors, ensuring they merely keep pace rather than pull ahead. It's business intelligence as a parity mechanism, not as a competitive advantage.
Breaking Out of the Data Echo Chamber
To transform this situation, organizations need to fundamentally reconsider their approach to business intelligence:
Focus on unique data sources: Seek out information your competitors don't have. This might include proprietary customer insights, unique partnerships that provide exclusive data, or innovative ways of analyzing existing information.
Prioritize actionability over information: Don't just ask "What's happening?" Ask "What should we do about what's happening?" Every analysis should end with clear, specific recommendations for action.
Contextual intelligence matters: Raw data doesn't account for your company's specific situation, history, resources, and capabilities. True intelligence comes from contextualizing information within your unique business reality.
Invest in interpretation, not just collection: The competitive advantage comes not from having data but from interpreting it more effectively than competitors. This requires human judgment, industry expertise, and strategic thinking that no dashboard can provide.
The companies that will thrive in the coming years aren't necessarily those with the most data or the fanciest visualization tools. They'll be the ones that transform how they generate insights from that information—creating unique perspectives that lead to differentiated strategies their competitors can't easily replicate.
As you evaluate your own business intelligence approach, ask yourself: Are you just collecting the same data as everyone else, or are you generating truly unique insights that can drive distinctive strategic action? Learn more today by downloading our free white paper.
If you want to find out how to get more out of the data you already own and capitalize on new information that is available to you today, reach out to us today for a no-obligation consultation.
Comments